<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comentários sobre: Sobre Solzhenitsyn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dicta.com.br/sobre-solzhenitsyn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dicta.com.br/sobre-solzhenitsyn/</link>
	<description>Leituras interessantes e bases para a formação cultural</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Wagner</title>
		<link>http://www.dicta.com.br/sobre-solzhenitsyn/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dicta.com.br/?p=180#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Anexo um belo artigo publicado ontem no Estadão, de autoria do Gilles Lapouge, sobre Soljenitsin.

http://arquivoetc.blogspot.com/

Wagner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anexo um belo artigo publicado ontem no Estadão, de autoria do Gilles Lapouge, sobre Soljenitsin.</p>
<p><a href="http://arquivoetc.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://arquivoetc.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>Wagner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Eduardo Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.dicta.com.br/sobre-solzhenitsyn/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Eduardo Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dicta.com.br/?p=180#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Rodrigo, 
O Times Online cita (http://timesonline.typepad.com/comment/2008/08/the-most-brilli.html) um trecho irretocável de uma entrevista antiga do Solzhenitsyn:

    &quot;I am surprised that pragmatic philosophy consistently scorns moral considerations - and nowadays in the Western press we read a candid declaration of the principle that moral considerations have nothing to do with politics. They do not apply, and should not, so to speak, be applied. I would remind you that in 1939 England thought differently. If moral considerations were not applicable to politics, then it would have been quite incomprehensible why on earth England went to war with Hitler&#039;s Germany.

    Pragmatically, you could have got out of the situation. But England chose the moral course and experienced and demonstrated to the world perhaps the most brilliant and heroic period in its history. &quot;

Que tapa na cara do país da BBC!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rodrigo,<br />
O Times Online cita (<a href="http://timesonline.typepad.com/comment/2008/08/the-most-brilli.html" rel="nofollow">http://timesonline.typepad.com/comment/2008/08/the-most-brilli.html</a>) um trecho irretocável de uma entrevista antiga do Solzhenitsyn:</p>
<p>    &#8220;I am surprised that pragmatic philosophy consistently scorns moral considerations &#8211; and nowadays in the Western press we read a candid declaration of the principle that moral considerations have nothing to do with politics. They do not apply, and should not, so to speak, be applied. I would remind you that in 1939 England thought differently. If moral considerations were not applicable to politics, then it would have been quite incomprehensible why on earth England went to war with Hitler&#8217;s Germany.</p>
<p>    Pragmatically, you could have got out of the situation. But England chose the moral course and experienced and demonstrated to the world perhaps the most brilliant and heroic period in its history. &#8221;</p>
<p>Que tapa na cara do país da BBC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

